Its surprising how much you can accomplish if you don't care who gets the credit
[Take heart, true conservatives. Here's the guy to carry on what Congressman Franks began. Sheriff Mack is a man of unwavering principles. How often does a district get such a stellar candidate? Not very. We fully support Sheriff Mack.]
The Founder and President of CSPOA, Sheriff Richard Mack, announced today that he is a candidate for Congress in Arizona’s 8th District. Here is his news release:
15 December 2017 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Rick Dalton 480-234-2687
Dawn Mack 480-840-9091
Note: Calls may be screened and returned shortly after receipt
FORMER AZ SHERIFF RICHARD MACK WILL RUN FOR CD8 CONGRESSIONAL SEAT BEING VACATED BY TRENT FRANKS
Former Graham County Sheriff Richard Mack Announced today his intention to run for Congress in Arizona’s 8th district. The current occupant of that seat, Trent Franks (R-AZ), announced recently his resignation from Congress. Sheriff Mack, who served two terms in the early 1990s, has been well-known for his strong stance in defending the Constitution and his victory at the U S Supreme Court against the Clinton Adm.
Mack has been inducted into the NRA Hall of Fame, has served as the communications director for Gun Owners of America (GOA), and currently is the President and founder of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association (CSPOA.org). CSPOA has been in the forefront of training law enforcement officers and elected officials to keep their oaths to protect and preserve the Constitution.
Mack’s candidacy will focus on bringing justice to the thousands of Americans who have been imprisoned by federal bureaucrats. He stands against the feds “creating criminals,”
the ruthlessness of the IRS, and the Department of Education’s utilization of SWAT teams. “If we are going to really ‘drain the swamp,’ then these atrocities cannot continue.” (Sheriff Mack)
I agree he is a true Constitutional patriot however as an fyi Mack does strongly support legalization of pot on the less government track and I agree we don't want every aspect of our lives mandated by big brother however I am agains pot and tho I would vote for him because he is not a swamp creature like the rest of the people just sayin' don't want Pot messing up the brains of our youth.
With several candidates I suggest they each be evaluated based on the following.
Insanity has been defined as repeating a process and expecting a different result. It’s important voters stop electing politicians lacking the knowledge, courage, and/or integrity needed to honor their oath. Hopefully, these questions will improve the vetting process.
QUESTIONS FOR POLITICAL CANDIDATES & INCUMBENTS
Dear __________________________________ Do you agree:
1 The purpose of government is to secure people’s unalienable Rights to Life, Liberty and an opportunity for Happiness as stated in the Declaration of Independence? Yes no
1 To be lawful government must comply with the principles and policies set forth in our Declaration of Independence, Constitution and Bill of Rights when interpreted in the spirit of providing American’s life, liberty, and an opportunity for happiness? Yes No
Any government Act that’s diminished or destroyed any Americans ability to enjoy a Right is an unlawful Act that must be corrected in order for government to be lawful? Yes no
“Federal action has exceeded the clear bounds of its jurisdiction under the Constitution and thus violated rights guaranteed the people” as alleged by thirty governors? Yes No
The governor’s pledge “to restore to the states and the people the prerogatives and freedoms guaranteed them under the Constitution” must be supported? Yes No If yes will you act to support this pledge? Yes No
To be lawful government must comply with the principles and policies set forth in our Declaration of Independence, Constitution and Bill of Rights when interpreted in the spirit of providing American’s life, liberty, and an opportunity for happiness? Yes No
The Constitution's 10th Amendment stating "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution .... are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people" provides incontestable evidence that the only lawful powers of the Federal Government are those specified in the Constitution? Yes No
States created the federal government as their AGENT and therefore possess the ultimate authority and responsibility for the proper interpretation and implementation of the Constitution and have a fiduciary responsibility to do so? Yes No
Two threats to the Constitution are a Constitutional Convention and bankruptcy of our states? Yes No If yes will you support legislation designed to minimize or eliminate these threats? Yes No
To fulfill the governor’s pledge the US must control its own destiny which requires modifying or terminating its membership in the United Nations and returning to a wealth based medium of exchange meeting the spirit and intent of Art. 1. Sec. 8:5 of the Constitution? Yes No If yes, will you introduce legislation dedicated to these changes? Yes No
The Emergency Banking Act of 3/9/33 that made Americans official enemies of the Federal government and gave dictatorial powers to the Presidency must be repealed? Yes No
Treaties, a purview of the President with the advice and consent of the Senate, cannot lawfully create law as Art. 1 Sec.1 of our Constitution vested all legislative powers in the Congress? Yes No
States are free to exercise the doctrines of “interposition” and “nullification” and reject Federal legislation with which they disagree. (see South Carolinas 1832 Ordinance of Nullification) agree disagree
The 1946 change to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure denying citizens their seventh Amendment right to Common Law Grand Juries was an un constitutional Federal action that states must nullify and/or circumvent? Yes No If yes will you introduce or support such action? Yes No
Now that is one thorough, beautiful list, Walter! I've got to research the Emergency Banking Act of 3/9/33 and the The 1946 change to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure that you mention (or maybe you could give us all a brief summary), but if they are consistent with the spirit of all the other items in your list then I am 100% in favor.
I am printing your list and will use parts of it during Q&A of candidates at my LD meetings.
The Emergency Banking Act can be viewed at Public Law 1 48 stat 1 . I'm in a rush and will have to locate the exact wording on the change to the Criminal procedure later.