Arizona Citizens Supporting Honest Representative Government At All Levels
A update, The truth exposed ! The Unanimous Declaration Of The Thirteen United States Of America: July 4, 1776, Sussex Document, is a major find, and will become a political blunder against the British Empire, and the news media here in America.
A second video is about to go on line, we have the evidence to prove all the way to the Washington Post, and CNN News,they did not share the whole truth plus many many other news networks, they may have not investagated the documents, and just shared what the elite want, but seeing how we are not governed by the elite, and we are still going over the document, more information to challenge the Social Networking News Media is at work, further proving they lied or just failed to investigate.
And we do stand by the statement that the media did not want to share the information that British Royalty, of the Bill Clinton family was involved in the document, back around the very same time period. it would cause a international scandal. They should of just destroyed the document instead of trying to dis-credit the Sussex: Document as just a copy.
It should also be noted, this document is the building of a People's Government of The Republic. Placing We the People In Authority of the States as well as the Federal Government. Its the Wolds Largest Complaint Against England.
After placing the document under a 50 to 100% magnification, we find names, not shared, so us little Tea Party Patriots will.
First a copy and past of a writing connected to the title header of the document, now we could of got the name wrong, we do acknowledge this. Also below is a text, for, "The Unanimous Declaration Of The Thirteen United States Of America: July 4, 1776 ", and I find it funny, this text, because they stated this document was hidden away for all most 200 years.....????
Snapshots of the document show a date of July 4, 1776, for this The Sussex: Declaration of Independence Of the United States of America
Titled as- TR Cengiefs
The Declaration Of The Thirteen States Of America
TR Cengiefs , which meaning- Cengiefs is willing to hope that the patriotiftri and goad fenfe of your ftate will be influenced \sy motives fo important, and they re- queft, fir, that you will be pleafed
Journals of Congress : Containing the proceedings from Sept. 5, 1774 to [3d day of November 1788] ..."
On the left above photo, is July 4th
On the right hand side of photo above is 1776
The image above in our view and according to them the document was nailed to a wall and we agree, but the whole in the middle here tell us that the document was stabbed with a dagger.
this name looks like Benj. Franklin., this was not listed in the names, there listed name are below, found on page 21: http://teapartyorg.ning.com/forum/topics/sussex-declaration-of-inde...
next names found below are.....Th ? Jefferson
next name below is Fra or Fia Littlefoot Lee, a tribal name ?
next John Hancock, Richard Adams and others
here is a small collection of names.
Working on the text, I think, this is close but I am not sure... there is something strange about this document,
Titled as- TR Cengiefs
The Declaration Of The Thirteen States Of America July 4, 1776, for this The Sussex:
hen in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.
We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.
I have to confess. I don't understand what all this means
This means there are people who are trying to change the meaning of our Declaration of Independence and submitting an alternate theory to claim our founding documents are in error and the founders didn't really mean all we have believed they said in the documents we have in our records for more than two centuries. Words mean things and if they are allowed to change the words and even the punctuation can change the meanings.
It is ever easier to confuse the issue by changing the meaning or wording to suit another narrative. The attempts to subvert or ignore the Constitution and all our founding documents is ongoing. Don't buy any of these lies for one minute. Our founders had more education and moral scruples than are apparent in these modern times. They were all steeped in solid Biblical teachings and had firm grasp of right and wrong according to those teachings.
thanks, that makes sense.
What this means, this is a Preamble Of The Declaration Of Independence, there are several out there. This one had a message, a code written by our Founders Of The Constitution.
The British hated the thought of Independence, and the Colonist, hated the British Empire. All of the very first Preambles, were submitted to the Crown to be approved, George Clinton, which was a member of Parliament, more so was, "George Clinton SR".
George Clinton is the Grate grate great Grandfather of Bill Clinton. Anyway George Clinton worked with the Colonist, preparing the Declaration Of Independence, but he never signed it.He made several trips to England, this has been confirmed.
While we were looking into the code, we found the Magna Charter, around 1200AD, the crown wanted to tax imports and exports of other countries within their occupied sovereignty,,,,
We did a follow up, posted 2 videos, and debunked the report, they lied.
Professor Danielle Allen Emily Sneff of The West Sussex Record Offi...
First the code which is no more then a way, they wrote back around 1200Ad 1700's. This "Cengiefs" , has been investagated. Its all very British.
Cengiefs- Is Willing To Hope
Mr. John Powelson,
I will make this as shot in text as I can, I do have the Books on this, and writings by Adams, one of our Founding Fathers.
First off, I believe in God and Country, I know there is a God, I understand history, I can read, I can research my finding, and this document is a major blow against England. They should of destroyed the document.
Political History Facts, ready, The Crown Of England arranged a loan to the Colony, through the EU Banks, it is not clear if it was Germany, France, or Spain. The site for the posted information that the Colony owed $73 Million Dollars in the war, and some site suggested the debit was $175 Million. The Colony was not aware that the loan came from the British Empire.
This is what happened, and how treaties were forced into the Deceleration Of Independence, to pay back the War Debit.
The list of abuses reflects the colonists' belief that their rights as British Citizens had been slowly eroded ever since the French and Indian War ended in 1763. Although the Declaration does not name the specific legislation passed by Parliament, its listing of the abuses and usurpation effectively covers the history of the King and Parliament's attempts to gain more power and control over the colonies. The list crescendos with the most offensive actions, aimed at total suppression of the colonies, that were put into effect just prior to the signing of the Declaration.
Many of the acts that the Declaration criticizes were intended to tighten royal control over the colonies. The history of Parliament's acts unfolded over a period of 13 years during which royal attempts to squash the civil liberties of colonists met with heightened colonial resistance. Beginning with The Proclamation of 1763, Parliament stripped colonists of the right to settle in the land between the Appalachian Mountains and the Mississippi River. This meant that although many colonists had given their lives to defend that land from the French, they would not be permitted to reap the benefits. Shortly after the proclamation, Parliament decided that the colonies would help repay the war debts, and enacted laws such as the Sugar Act (1764), the Stamp Tax (1765), the Townshend Acts (1767) and the Tea Act (1773). When the colonists protested against these acts, the King and Parliament responded by further suppressing the rights of colonists. Legislation in 1774 referred to by colonists as the "Intolerable Acts" struck especially hard at the civil rights of the colony of Massachusetts.
The Intolerable Acts differed from previous legislation. These acts struck not only at the economic freedom of the colonies, but at their political rights and legislative independence as well. Not only was the port of Boston closed to all trade, but a military governor was also appointed and the people of Massachusetts no longer had the right to elect their representatives, select jurors, or hold town meetings. Additionally, British soldiers accused of crimes would be tried in England, not in the colony, and a new Quartering Act forced colonists in Massachusetts to feed and house British soldiers. The passage of the Intolerable Acts indicated to many colonists, even those not living in Massachusetts, that the King and Parliament were more interested in asserting unconditional control than in preserving the civil liberties of the colonists.
The basic principle upon which the Declaration rests is that colonists, as British citizens, believed they were entitled to the rights and privileges granted by the Magna Carta, and the British Bill of Rights of 1689. Among other things, these documents established that the King was not above the law, that the people, represented in parliament, had a right to endorse or reject taxation, and that citizens were entitled to a trial by jury of their peers. Additionally, the Declaration relied on precedent: most British colonies had enjoyed self-rule and had been governed through their own legislative bodies since their founding. By 1774, most of the colonists that had once protested "no taxation without representation" found themselves without any representation whatsoever, neither in Parliament nor in any colonial house of representation.
The Magna Carta was used to incorporate Central Banking.
What Is (CETA) Decentralized Legislation: Part 2