Arizona Citizens Supporting Honest Representative Government At All Levels
State Sen. Kelli Ward, who is exploring a possible 2016 Republican primary challenge to incumbent U.S. Sen. John McCain, in a series of Twitter messages clarified that she does not believe in the "chemtrails" conspiracy theory.
Last month, Ward, R-Lake Havasu City, had told The Arizona Republic that she had no opinion about chemtrails one way or the other, despite having held a June 25 hearing in Kingman that addressed the topic.
Since then, FreedomWorks, one of the major tea-party-aligned national groups who is looking for a viable candidate to take on McCain, has cited her association with the fringe issue as a possible political liability.
"Chemtrails" conspiracists claim that airplanes, via visible contrails, are spraying dangerous chemicals into the air, either to change the weather or for other more sinister purposes.
"Let's just be clear - I don't believe in that," Ward tweeted to journalists and FreedomWorks on Wednesday.
"I've never believed it - many in my district do," she added in a follow-up message.
The "chemtrails" Twitter conversation started after Politico quoted Ward publicly spurning the conspiracy theory.
In March, Ward had told The Republic she was responding to constituent concerns and only arranged a forum for them to ask questions to state environmental experts.
"I don't really have any opinions about 'chemtrails' one way or the other," Ward told The Republic at the time. "I think that environmental quality, though, is very important."
Read more on azcentral.com
[Editor: Does Ward "believe" in chemtrails or not? Or can't she decide? If she doesn't believe in chemtrails, can she explain what is happening in our skies? Does she not know what a contrail looks like and that chemtrails are NOT the same? Puzzling. Either way, we don't think it should be a campaign issue.
More on Chemtrails vs Contrails: https://arizonafreedomalliance.ning.com/group/uncle-scam/forum/topi...]
Maybe she's not an early riser in the morning to see the difference.
Sounds so familiar ... like when the missile fired off the coast of California was though to be a simple contrail of an airliner. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7AMdHBgHtNE .
Senator Ward is an early riser and I sent her the two videos "What are they spraying?" and "Why are they spraying?" I have personally testified in the Senate in front of her and presented evidence of chemtrailing (aka geoengineering) that is going on when we were pushing through our A21 bills through the Senate a few years ago. Chemtrailing is occurring to keep up the lie of "global warming" so they are manipulating the weather to do so. Chemtrailing is causing horrific droughts in California, freak weather storms in the midwest and super snow storms on the east coast which all could be stopped by stopping chemtrailing.
It is a campaign fundraising and viability necessity that she formulates her position after being told what position is best for her political future, ala Clinton and McCain. Her complicity on HB2184, her chem trails wobbly past, her "exploratory" fundraising scheme, her overall consistent inconsistencies are issues. Those facts are why Ron Gould will run and defeat her for her current seat. If she does not have solid positions that cannot be swayed by political expediency in the Arizona legislative arena, just project what will happen in the boiling cauldron of Washington politics.
Conservatives cannnot afford to waste one minute or one dime on a campaign that may not happen and one that they can be almost positive will be a losing campaign. Johnny Mac will have as much money as he needs, and she does not have the gravitas to overcome the McCain largesse. Of course, she can use the money from conservatives across the state in her sham campaign to whatever use she eventually decides on. The $20 mil he spent against JD will seem miniscule in comparison if Macstain feels he is genuinely challenged. The North Carolina US Senate race should be a mile post of comparison in case anyone wants to look.
It would seem to me that of tens thousands of pilots, mechanics, fuel loaders, schedulers, and so on would have to agree to maintain secrecy, and agree to do in the first place, to seriously mess with the atmosphere and the surface of the earth for highly questionable purposes. In addition, they would have to buy into the notion of dumping chemicals on the American people, including themselves and their own families. Having flown in the Air Force, I can't even imagine how any significant number of people would agree to do that.
First, we don't know how many pilots are involved. It could be very few. And there are many secrets kept in our military and other governmental entities.
Second, there is no certainty that whoever is flying, loading, schedulers etc actually know the real story. You no doubt have heard of propaganda. They may have a manifest with totally inaccurate info. Inaccurate stories from Washington are de riguer
Third, all but a blind person can see something going on up there. Some days the skies are clear, others they are completely criss-crossed with these trails that are NOT from regular airplane contrails or rockets being shot off secretly.
Furthermore, these trails stay in the sky for hours. Contrails quickly evaporate.
So, Mike, you tell us what they are not. Tell us what they ARE
Kool response. Yes, Tell us what they ARE
One pilot has spoken out:
This is a message I received, from a credible source. This message is (allegedly) from a USAF pilot, who flies Aerosol Tankers, as part of the secret Indigo Skyfold (geoengineered aerosol "chemtrail") program.
Please save this text, and forward the video! (The text was too long for Youtube to put in the description, so I will put the entire message in the comments section.)
www.GeoEngineeringWatch.org explains that the scientific name is NOT "chemtrails" it is Geoengineering. Dane Wigington explains the scientific explanation of what they are spraying in our skies. Shasta County California counsel meeting was attended by over 400 people, Dane Wigington and many speakers explained Geoengineering to the counsel. I disagree that it should not be a campaign issue. Search GeoEngineeringWatch.org on You Tube, very educational.
When someone else brought this to my attention a while back, I looked through the Geoengineering website. I just shook my head on all the pseudo science and at the lack of serious testimonials by credential former military pilots and airlines and their support personnel. The fact that many people attended a conference and sent money to Dane Washington doesn't sway me too much. Even far greater numbers attend Global Warming/Climate Change Conferences. Going back to my posting above, do you believe large numbers of the American military would agree to do something like that and then stay totally secretive for many years?